PRESIDENT OBAMA IS A JERK AND A BUNGLER

Yes he is, perhaps the biggest jerk of being a U.S. President the likes of which we have never seen. It is over this tax cut deal that he did not have to give for anything. Keith Olbermann's comment on his show this evening summed it up that there is no way in hell that Republicans would have denied extended unemployment benefits nor not voted for them if tax cuts were not extended to the highest wage earners over 250,000 dollars. On top of this the payroll tax for social security was reduced. Funny how everybody was worried about social security not having its funds around to be solvent. Not only the President, but all you rotten politicans and we dumb Americans are being told an atrocious lie that social security is part of the budget. IT IS NOT. It is funded separately so it is not part of any budget. Never have so many people been so stupid over a bunch of no good politicians and President. Wake up!!!! Tea party candidates are not your answer because they will only provide the fire for people running around getting their monies through crime waves of robbery when certain benefits that need to be in place are gone. Conservatism to me is when government spends what it needs to spend on its constituents and not on a bunch or worthless programs ,earmarks or what not. The wealthiest do not need the tax cut extended because they are not helping the economy anyway. It is the average Joe or Jane that needs them and perhaps more than can meet the eye. They are the ones who spend on the most common goods and services needed that keep an economy rolling. Yachts and 300,000 dollar cars are not common goods. If we are not careful we sill not have the funds in government to take care of emergency situations on the homefront. There has to be a place of demarcation as to whether funds should come from a state, from the Feds or a combination of both. For instance security of our borders is a federal expense to secure THE COUNTRY. Having a military is a federal expense because it secures THE COUNTRY. Suppose my state needs a new bridge over a river,lake or something of that nature. That bridge must be evaluated as to whether it falls on state,federal or a combo of both. If that new bridge has no value to the federal infrastucture then it is a state expense. If that bridge is vital to both statewide and federal commerce, then it is a shared expense. President Obama should not run for office in 2012; enough bungeling has taken place